Die in a Gunfight 2021
IMDb Ratings: 4.4/10
Genres: Action, Comedy, Crime
Language: Hindi(Unofficial VO) + English(ORG)
Release Year: 2021
Director: Collin Schiffli
Stars Cast: Diego Boneta, Alexandra Daddario, Justin Chatwin
Director: Collin Schiffli
Stars Cast: Diego Boneta, Alexandra Daddario, Justin Chatwin
Die in a Gunfight Screenshots
Die in a Gunfight Review
So let's start with one of the best features.
The characters and characters are amazing.
(listed here with their Romeo and Juliet equals) Starting with the best -
Travis Fimmel - (ragnar from viking) one of my favorite modern stars brings his unique style to a very small part - he plays Wayne (Benvolio) a hitman hired by Rathcart (capulet) underling Terrence (Tybalt)
Wade Allain-Marcus - a person I have never seen or heard of is amazing as Mukul (Mercutio) plays his role in an admirable way.
Diego Boneta - Ben Gibbon (romeo) gives the director exactly what he asks for, it may not be everyone's taste, but he does a good job as directed at this.
Justin Chatwin - Terrence (Tybalt) did a great job as an opponent and kind of boyfriend for Mary Rathcart (Juliet)
Alexandra Daddario - Mary Rathcart (juliet) most reviewers seem to be watching this do a passing job, she did not have much dialogue and honestly you could put any attractive girl in her place and it would not make a difference. , but there is nothing in his conduct that you can blame him for, and his good smile and good eyesight do not harm the sure role.
for those who cry for imitation I think they cry out for a direct style, which is different from imitation, all the actors give the director what he asked for and that is their job, not to play the character. the way each person watching the movie wants to play it.
The reason I included the same romeo and juliet characters is because a few reviewers said they couldn't find it. For me to actually make that connection was one of the funniest things about watching this movie, but I wouldn’t consider it a waste.
I liked the narratives of the novel novel style, but at the same time some of those were not there to allow the characters to add depth to their character.
Every analogy of the very Gibbon monkey they are so obsessed with distracts me from the movie and the main character in my opinion.
And the most subtle and overly detailed was the fact that this was a recount of romeo and juliet, it was obvious even though there was some humor in the discussion of how the quarrel started.
All in all I thought this was a really good film, or in the first 15 minutes a thought running through my head I had to do some modern romeo and Juliet reunited especially after the decaprio / danes version, but quickly find Your Place and stand out from other episodes, don’t expect that will play exactly like Shakespeare's as I said in its re-narrative but there are similarities everywhere. It has a few annoying moments but every good movie finds its place as a different narrative of an old legend.
The characters and characters are amazing.
(listed here with their Romeo and Juliet equals) Starting with the best -
Travis Fimmel - (ragnar from viking) one of my favorite modern stars brings his unique style to a very small part - he plays Wayne (Benvolio) a hitman hired by Rathcart (capulet) underling Terrence (Tybalt)
Wade Allain-Marcus - a person I have never seen or heard of is amazing as Mukul (Mercutio) plays his role in an admirable way.
Diego Boneta - Ben Gibbon (romeo) gives the director exactly what he asks for, it may not be everyone's taste, but he does a good job as directed at this.
Justin Chatwin - Terrence (Tybalt) did a great job as an opponent and kind of boyfriend for Mary Rathcart (Juliet)
Alexandra Daddario - Mary Rathcart (juliet) most reviewers seem to be watching this do a passing job, she did not have much dialogue and honestly you could put any attractive girl in her place and it would not make a difference. , but there is nothing in his conduct that you can blame him for, and his good smile and good eyesight do not harm the sure role.
for those who cry for imitation I think they cry out for a direct style, which is different from imitation, all the actors give the director what he asked for and that is their job, not to play the character. the way each person watching the movie wants to play it.
The reason I included the same romeo and juliet characters is because a few reviewers said they couldn't find it. For me to actually make that connection was one of the funniest things about watching this movie, but I wouldn’t consider it a waste.
I liked the narratives of the novel novel style, but at the same time some of those were not there to allow the characters to add depth to their character.
Every analogy of the very Gibbon monkey they are so obsessed with distracts me from the movie and the main character in my opinion.
And the most subtle and overly detailed was the fact that this was a recount of romeo and juliet, it was obvious even though there was some humor in the discussion of how the quarrel started.
All in all I thought this was a really good film, or in the first 15 minutes a thought running through my head I had to do some modern romeo and Juliet reunited especially after the decaprio / danes version, but quickly find Your Place and stand out from other episodes, don’t expect that will play exactly like Shakespeare's as I said in its re-narrative but there are similarities everywhere. It has a few annoying moments but every good movie finds its place as a different narrative of an old legend.
